Censorship and Selection Essay -- self-censorship

Introduction security review is a dirty word to information professionals. Attempts by individuals or groups to restrict the public from reading, hearing or viewing authorized materials due to their content, is enough to send librarians and organizations such as the American subroutine library Association, to the proverbial battle field. However, information professionals from all fields confine to contrive choices about what to include and what not to include in their particular librarys collection. How atomic number 18 these pickaxes made? What causes one decimal point to be selected instead of another? The banknote between censorship and selection is infinitesimal, dependent mainly upon the role of the individuals involved. As an information professional, who inherently is charged with the responsibility to protect the rights of the public to have free access to materials, much care must be interpreted in the selection of materials. By evaluating the collections, by carefu lly examining what deeply held beliefs we have, and by carefully adhering to selection policies, information professionals can guard against allowing personal persuade influencing selection decisions. What Is Censorship?Censorship can take many forms, plainly it inherently leads to an individual or group attempting to restrict access to materials. Jenkinson (2002) defines a censor as someone who begins with a list of negatives or no-nos and because seeks to identify whether any of these taboo words, subjects, themes or attitudes are present in an point (p. 22). Irregardless of the context, a censor then seeks to either have the item removed, or not acquired at all. (Jenkinson, 2002, p. 22). Censorship can take adorn in a visible manner, such as a rear or group challenging a book. However, a far more... ...Hill, R. (2010). The enigma of self-censorship. School depository library Journal. (27)2. p. 9-12.Kidd, K. (2009). Not Censorship but Selection Censorship and/as prizing. Childrens Literature in Education, 40(3), 197-216. doi10.1007/s10583-008-9078-4 Mazer, Norma Fox. (1997). Shhhh The ALAN Review. (24)2, 46-48. Retrieved from http//scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ALAN/winter97/w97-10-Censorship.html McMenemy, D. (2008). Selection and censorship librarians and their collections.Library Review,57(5),341-344. doi1497848431Staples, S. (1996). What Johnny Cant Read. The ALAN Review. (23)2, n.p. Retrieved from http//scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/ALAN/winter96/pubCONN.htmlVan Kampen, Doris J., and Rose Spino. 2007. Issues in the retention and selection of materials Censorship and self-selection. Catholic Library World 77(3), 222-225.